{"id":36283,"date":"2021-05-09T17:07:50","date_gmt":"2021-05-09T14:07:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/?p=36283"},"modified":"2021-05-09T17:11:59","modified_gmt":"2021-05-09T14:11:59","slug":"im-getting-married-getting-married-what-kind-of-toys-can-there-be","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/im-getting-married-getting-married-what-kind-of-toys-can-there-be\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cI&#8217;m Getting Married, Getting Married, What Kind of Toys Can There Be?\u2026\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Yes, there will actually be no toys!!! Kidding. There will be toys, just sort<br>of different ones. Like the real children&#8217;s toys, scattered around the<br>house!<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tell me, was there ever a time when you saw a couple, who would be in<br>a hurry to get married while simultaneously understanding that things<br>would not work out in the best way possible? Of course, you\u2019d answer.<br>And why? Most likely, you haven\u2019t thought about this deeply, so let me<br>do this for you. Trust me, various family psychologists have been<br>brainstorming on this topic for quite some time now and have already<br>shared their discoveries with Domokhozi. With your permission, let\u2019s<br>put aside the financial hurdles, domination, and domestic violence for<br>now. Instead, let&#8217;s try to think above all this, in the context of the<br>modern world and progressive mind. Let&#8217;s leave the \u201cbream\u201d outside<br>the threshold of this resource \u2014 after all, we are \u201cbroad-minded\u201d.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf One of the main reasons of irreconcilable conflicts in the family,<br>that could be resolved in therapy is the condemnation of one<br>partner against the other. It is trite, you might say. Yet, try to dig<br>deeper. The one who condemns pursues a certain goal \u2014 this<br>person wants their partner to change. The accused expects the<br>accuser to calm down. If such a model is present in young people<br>at the beginning of a relationship, then the chances of a happy<br>union are reduced to almost zero. This model demonstrates the<br>deeper problem of the accuser. To be precise, the inability to<br>accept your partner as he\/she is. Before trying to change your<br>partner, ask them the question: are you ready to change? If not,<br>DO NOT get married! In fact, why aspire to change something in<br>advance that ultimately would never change??? Because you<br>think you can? Then understand that you are alone in this boat<br>and do not involve your partner there, who told you that he\/she<br>doesn\u2019t wish to change.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf The couple can sense that each one of them is individually<br>unfulfilled, and only together they can be 100 percent. The phrase<br>\u201cI miss you\u201d is good, of course, as a beautiful wording and a way of<br>expressing the emotion of desire to be close to someone. If the<br>absence of a certain person physically and mentally hurts you,<br>then this is, unfortunately, a deviation. This is a \u201cbad\u201d love,<br>destructive instead of constructive. I always say that even<br>mathematically 50 + 50 is much less (worse in a relationship) than<br>100 + 100. Between a relationship and the idea that you yearn a<br>partner to feel fulfilled, you automatically burden them. By this<br>way, you make your partner responsible for their own moral<br>health. The idea of a single whole is utopian or, if you prefer,<br>romantic. And romance, as you know, is a delicate, short-lived and<br>deceptive matter. Eventually, someone would stand with their feet<br>on the ground and wash the dishes, clean up the poop and vomit,<br>wake up before dawn to go to work and see their boss&#8217;s stupid<br>face. Therefore, the theory of the \u201cmy other half\u201d, which is<br>supposed to make you happy, is great but rather for movies,<br>poetry, books, and other virtual realities.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf The inability to honestly assess your partner\u2019s behavior, justifying<br>his actions with the words like, \u201cwell, he is just like that\u2026\u201d. First of<br>all, it would be helpful to understand what does \u201cjust like that\u201d<br>even mean? Are they hiding their true feelings from you? For<br>example, a partner doesn&#8217;t want children. He is not ready for this<br>or, in principle, does not like kids. During your life, you most likely<br>would have to accept it and not have children with this person,<br>because you cannot change his attitude towards children. So,<br>before the wedding, you should conclude whether you know<br>everything about your partner or not. I have met many couples in<br>which a woman is ready and wants children, but a man is not<br>ready and does not accept this fact even within himself, yet aims<br>not to upset his spouse and still make her happy. Make her happy<br>instead of making both of them happy! In the future, a woman is<br>doomed to lack of support in raising their offspring. The result is<br>disastrous: accusations, rupture. A man, as a rule, retires in such<br>cases, and a woman remains a single mother.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf Anything that\u2019s more important than your relationship. Work,<br>family (parents and other relatives), friends should not stand in<br>the center or in front of the interests of your relationship. Of<br>course, there are emergencies that require an increased attention<br>(illness of a relative, for example, would be a responsible project),<br>but this should be temporary. If a partner is completely immersed<br>in a certain situation, and your family is secondary to him, it is<br>worth asking yourself \u2014 why??? Why do other factors override the<br>value and significance of the family? What are you avoiding and<br>for what reasons?<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf One of the partners believes that he sacrificed himself and<br>became a victim. For instance, he put his career aside for the sake<br>of his children or his partner&#8217;s career. When deciding to sacrifice<br>yourself, this should be YOUR PERSONAL decision, and your<br>partner must approve of it. I am not sure that such a formulation<br>of the question would satisfy another. No sane person would want<br>to live with the feeling that someone sacrificed themselves for<br>him. And those who would like it are just sadists. Therefore, when<br>making a decision, it should only be your choice, and the results of<br>it should be disentangled by you personally, rather than by both<br>you and your partner.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u25cf The lack of emotional and physical intimacy is a bad sign. If you<br>love each other, then why would you avoid intimacy? Why would<br>there be an alternative to the latter??? Do you desire to be<br>intimate with another person? Emotionally wise too? Then say<br>goodbye to your partner. In any case, it would be the beginning of<br>an end. If your best friend is your most loyal partner, then why<br>does someone else receive the best you have?<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In conclusion, I would like to say that a healthy relationship between<br>two people implies personal independence from each other as well as<br>emotional individual peace and mutual respect for each one\u2019s point of<br>view. Otherwise, if the model of behavior is built in such a way that the<br>other partner should dominate, then the first partner would gradually<br>be \u201cerased\u201d and broken. This would lead to an imbalance in the<br>relationship, and it would lose all the meaning. Here, in fact, other levers<br>of restraint would arise, such as children, for example. However, you<br>should always remember that children tend to grow up and leave their<br>parents\u2019 house. Would you be ready to be alone with each other after 20<br>years of marriage??? If yes, then get married!!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Author:  Masha Lopatova<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yes, there will actually be no toys!!! Kidding. There will be toys, just sortof different ones. Like the real children&#8217;s toys, scattered around thehouse! Tell me, was there ever a time when you saw a couple, who would be ina hurry to get married while simultaneously understanding that thingswould not work out in the best<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":35794,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[73],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36283"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36283"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36283\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":36293,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36283\/revisions\/36293"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lopatova.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}